Research that works for developing countries and AustraliaSurvey of potential of manure for meeting crop nutrient needs with integrated nutrient management in Madhya Pradesh, IndiaProject ID: LWR2/1998/136Collaborating Countries: IndiaCommissioned Organisation: Queensland Department of Natural Resources, AustraliaProject Leader Dr Ram Dalal Phone: 07 38969895 Fax: 07 3896 9898 Email: Ram.Dalal@dnr.qld.gov.au Collaborating Institutions:
Project Budget: $150,000Project Duration: 01/01/2001 - 30/06/2002Project Extension: 01/07/2002 - 31/03/2003ACIAR Research Program Manager Dr Tony Fischer Project Background and Objectives Concerns for organic farming and increased use of organic manures are being raised in the India. Despite low fertility status of soils in Madhya Pradesh, less than 50% of dung produced is used as farmyard manure (FYM), i.e. for growing food crops. It is necessary to assess the potential of FYM and hence increasing its use to meet crop nutrient needs. This requires consideration of factors affecting competing uses of FYM, now and into the future, as well as consideration of alternative nutrient sources. The specific objective would be to learn of the constraints - real, perceived, biophysical and economic - to the better use of manure as a source of nutrients for cropping. Such information would underpin future research on manure utilisation as a fertiliser substitute. The focus would be on winter and summer cropping on vertisols, the predominant cropping system and soil type at each location. The survey assessed district-level nutrient balances and trends for farmyard manure (FYM) use for the dominant cropping systems in Madhya Pradesh using district-level secondary data (a desk-top study). In two key districts the researchers focused on the trends in alternative uses for cattle dung, including FYM, and used quantitative and qualitative methodologies to reveal other factors (including socio-economic considerations and crop responses to FYM) likely to affect their use. Project Outcomes The researchers found that both the Indian and the Australian FYM users believed that FYM was good for increasing yield, and most felt that it increased water-holding capacity of soil. However, the knowledge about the plant nutrient value of FYM among the users was very low. Consequently, Indian farmers under-fertilized, whereas the Australian farmers over-fertilized their crops, so that both missed the realisation of optimum gross margins. Moreover, the Australian farmers also faced the potential pollution of dams and waterways. |
World populationChange website theme (for low bandwidth version)RSS FeedsOur ProgramsBy Country: |